it wasnt for peoples amusement. it was just to give people options on how they wanted to go...not everyone would want to go with the injection. some people might take want an explosive end. and it wouldnt be any danger to anyone because it would be done in a controlled environment....jeez. im not fucking retarded.
Euthanasia
Started by
MissTengu
, Jun 25 2010 00:19 hrs
#21
OFFLINE
Posted 18 September 2010 - 14:06 hrs
OFFLINE
#22
OFFLINE
Posted 18 September 2010 - 23:10 hrs
OFFLINE
~sighs and resists the urge to rub my temples~ Look. For one thing I did not call you a "Fucking retard." And neither did I indicate as such. I just stated my opinion that your 'ideas' are unrealistic and not as serious as this topic requies, as this is a serious topic that does not need people coming in and coming up with such ideas.
Please can we move back to a more SERIOUS tone for this subject? Again. I ask. Again. Do you seriously think that people who are in great amounts of pain would want to die in an 'explosive manner'. It would cause them a huge amount of pain before they eventually died. It would also take them longer to die. Then you have to think of the COST of that kind of end. Not only do you have to pay a lot for the explosives, but the blast chamber itself, the staff responsible for cleaning up the horrific mess, the bomb experts etc etc. I could go on. And then you have the risk of perhaps them not being rigged right and the bombs not exploding. You would then need bomb squads to come in. And then what if criminals break into the place? And steal explosives? It could happen. Could you imagine the damage they could do? I don't think you have thought this through at all. There are to many risk factors involved, not to mention the patient would be petrified as they are going like a terrorist after all. In fact, people might think of it as such. Not to mention there will be a LOT of people opposed to it, like myself, who will protest and stop the staff from doing what they are doing which can cause more expensive and not to mention a lot of unneeded chaos. At least with the injection they can go a nice quiet manner, and although there are people opposed to it, there would not be as many as there are opposed to your idea.
Please... serious opinions. I am growing tired of this =/ This topic is about whether Euthanasia is either right or wrong, not the methods. You are straying from the subject at hand, which is against the rules.
Please can we move back to a more SERIOUS tone for this subject? Again. I ask. Again. Do you seriously think that people who are in great amounts of pain would want to die in an 'explosive manner'. It would cause them a huge amount of pain before they eventually died. It would also take them longer to die. Then you have to think of the COST of that kind of end. Not only do you have to pay a lot for the explosives, but the blast chamber itself, the staff responsible for cleaning up the horrific mess, the bomb experts etc etc. I could go on. And then you have the risk of perhaps them not being rigged right and the bombs not exploding. You would then need bomb squads to come in. And then what if criminals break into the place? And steal explosives? It could happen. Could you imagine the damage they could do? I don't think you have thought this through at all. There are to many risk factors involved, not to mention the patient would be petrified as they are going like a terrorist after all. In fact, people might think of it as such. Not to mention there will be a LOT of people opposed to it, like myself, who will protest and stop the staff from doing what they are doing which can cause more expensive and not to mention a lot of unneeded chaos. At least with the injection they can go a nice quiet manner, and although there are people opposed to it, there would not be as many as there are opposed to your idea.
Please... serious opinions. I am growing tired of this =/ This topic is about whether Euthanasia is either right or wrong, not the methods. You are straying from the subject at hand, which is against the rules.
#23
OFFLINE
Posted 20 September 2010 - 10:04 hrs
OFFLINE
Shit's getting serious in here.

What would you do, if your relitive was on life support, and you're told no chance of them coming back to life. (I believe it's actually happened before, when someone was given no chance, they miraculusly came back to life. I think it was on that Fact or Fiction show... The one Commander William Riker from Star Trek hosted... Anyway, I digress. I can't remember if it were Fact or Fiction... I BELIEVE it was fact... But I've been so, so, SO wrong before.................. I DIGRESS AGAIN! ಲ_ಲ SRS BSNS)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 perverts, 1 voyeurs, 0 tentacle monsters



Sign In
Create Account

This topic is locked

Back to top














